Friday, July 24, 2009

Wildlife Extra News

 

World’s rarest deer found alive and well on Philippine islands

22/07/2009 09:05:16

world/Asia/visayan_spotted_deer_turner

Visayan spotted deer are now only found on 2 remote Philippine islands. Credit Dr Craig Turner

 

July 2009. The Negros Interior Biodiversity Expedition (NIBE) has confirmed that it had found evidence of two groups of the Visayan Spotted Deer alive and well in the North Negros Natural Park (NNNP) in the Philippines. The team of experts recently returned from the first scientific exploration of the park interior where they recorded the presence of many endangered and endemic species, with several new species records for the NNNP.

The Visayan Spotted Deer (Cervus alfredi) is endemic to the Visayan islands of the central Philippines, formerly reported on only seven islands (Cebu, Guimaras, Leyte, Masbate, Negros, Panay, and Samar), but now thought to remain only on the islands of Panay and Negros. It is a small deer found only in tropical rainforests up to about 1500 metres and has been hunted from 95% of its range. The population within the NNNP was believed to be one of the few viable breeding groups left in world with possibly no more than a couple of hundred individuals surviving. Heavy hunting pressure has led to the deer not being recorded in the NNNP for many years until the NIBE team found fresh deer droppings in several locations, deer tracks and significant evidence of feeding activity.

Wildlife Extra News - World’s rarest deer found alive and well on Philippine islands

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Kenya Wildlife Services says elephant numbers have doubled

 

Ethiopian News Forum

Kenya Wildlife Services says elephant numbers have doubled

Posted by Mehret Tesfaye | July 21st, 2009 at 1:56 am |

Nairobi — Kenya’s elephant population has doubled following the international ban on trade of wildlife products. But Kenya Wildlife Services (KWS) is warning the gain, which saw the number of elephants rise to 32,000 from 16,000 in 1989, could be wiped out due to increased poaching prompted by the lifting of the partial ban in some African countries recently.

KWS Director Julius Kipng’etich said the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) decision in 2007 to partially lift the international trade ban on ivory had stimulated poaching across elephant range and ivory smuggling.

The ban was to allow for a one-off sale to China and Japan by four countries; Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe.

"Kenya remains opposed to lifting of the ivory trade ban particularly the nine-year ivory trade moratorium that was linked to the one-off sale," Dr Kipng’etich told The Standard during the 20th anniversary of the 1989 ivory burning at the Nairobi National Park.

He said the upsurge in poaching was leading to an estimated 90 elephant deaths in a year.

Despite the stirred markets as a result of the lift in ivory sales, he cited lack of strong enforcement laws in neighbouring countries as a major setback to full protection of the endangered species.

Kipng’etich said KWS had built capacity among its officers to detect the movement of wildlife and their products, and pledged to extend the same to the neighbouring countries.

"Wildlife anywhere, should concern us all as any loss is a loss to all of us, this is why we want to take a lead and teach the world about conservation," he said.

Mr Patrick Omondi, KWS head of species management, said there was need to protect wildlife, for future generations, as well maintain an influx of tourists for economic gain.

"This commemoration reminds the world that illegal trade in ivory still remains a threat to African elephants," Omondi said, adding that human-animal conflict remains a threat to wildlife due to lack of a clear land use policy.

- By Ramadhan Rajab | The Standard

Kenya Wildlife Services says elephant numbers have doubled | Ethiopian News

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Economic View - The Invisible Hand, Trumped by Darwin? - NYTimes.com

Economic View

The Invisible Hand, Trumped by Darwin?

  • By ROBERT H. FRANK

Published: July 11, 2009

IF asked to identify the intellectual founder of their discipline, most economists today would probably cite Adam Smith. But that will change. Economists’ forecasts generally aren’t worth much, but I’ll offer one that even my youngest colleagues won’t survive to refute: If we posed the same question 100 years from now, most economists would instead cite Charles Darwin.

Darwin, renowned for the theory of evolution, was a naturalist, not an economist, and his view of the competitive struggle was different from Smith’s in subtle but profound ways. Growing evidence suggests that Darwin’s view tracks economic reality much more closely.

Smith is celebrated for his “invisible hand” theory, which holds that when greedy people trade for their own advantage in unfettered private markets, they will often be led, as if by an invisible hand, to produce the greatest good for all. The invisible hand remains a powerful narrative, but after the recent economic wreckage, skepticism about it has grown. My prediction is that it will eventually be supplanted by a version of Darwin’s more general narrative — one that grants the invisible hand its due, but also strips it of the sweeping powers that many now ascribe to it.

Economic View - The Invisible Hand, Trumped by Darwin? - NYTimes.com

Saturday, July 11, 2009

IUCN - Quarter of antelope species in danger of extinction

 

Quarter of antelope species in danger of extinction

04 March 2009 | News - Press Release

A quarter of all antelope species are threatened with extinction, according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™.

The results, compiled by the Antelope Specialist Group of IUCN’s Species Survival Commission, show that out of 91 species of antelope, 25 are threatened with extinction. The status of several species has become worse since the last complete assessment of all antelopes in 1996.

“Unsustainable harvesting, whether for food or traditional medicine, and human encroachment on their habitat are the main threats facing antelopes,” says Dr Philippe Chardonnet, Co-Chair of the IUCN Antelope Specialist Group. “Most antelopes are found in developing countries which is why it’s critically important that we collaborate with local communities there since it is in their own interest to help preserve these animals.”

Five species of antelope are in the highest category of threat, Critically Endangered, including the Dama Gazelle (Nanger dama), Aders’ Duiker (Cephalophus adersi), the Saiga Antelope (Saiga tatarica), Hirola (Beatragus hunteri) and Addax (Addax nasomaculatus). The Scimitar Horned Oryx (Oryx dammah) is already Extinct in the Wild, but there are ongoing efforts to reintroduce it. The Dama Gazelle and Addax are both reduced to tiny remnant populations and highlight the dire situation for wildlife in the Sahelo-Saharan region.

IUCN - Quarter of antelope species in danger of extinction

WWF International - Elephant-size loopholes

 

Elephant-size loopholes sustain Thai ivory trade

Posted on 19 June 2009

© Daniel Stiles / TRAFFIC Southeast Asia

Thai elephant mother and calf

Download

The report also raises concerns that legal provisions governing trade in domesticated elephants are providing cover for illegal trade in wild-caught, highly-endangered Asian elephants from both Thailand and neighbouring Myanmar.
TRAFFIC’s survey documented over 26,000 worked ivory products for sale in local markets, with many more retail outlets dealing in ivory products than were observed during market surveys carried out in 2001.
Market surveys found 50 more retail outlets offering ivory items in Bangkok and Chiang Mai in 2008 than the previous year. However, overall there was less worked ivory openly on sale than in 2001.
“Thailand has consistently been identified as one of the world’s top five countries most heavily implicated in the illicit ivory trade, but shows little sign of addressing outstanding issues,” said Tom Milliken, of TRAFFIC, which oversees a global monitoring programme, the Elephant Trade Information System (ETIS), for the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

WWF International - Elephant-size loopholes sustain Thai ivory trade

Feeding deer associated with a human and deer illnesses

 Feeding deer associated with a human and deer illnesses

Friday, July 10, 2009
By Becky Gillette

You might call it the Bambi syndrome. Well-intentioned people who love deer think they are helping them by setting out food, usually corn. That practice is known as "recreational feeding." Corn is also sometimes used to bait deer to make it easy for hunters to kill them.

Jay Gaylen, owner of Hart's Family Center in Eureka Springs, said they sell quite a bit of deer corn.

"In the wintertime we sell more than in the summertime because there are more people trying to help the deer out in the winter," Gaylen said.

But feeding the deer does more harm than good. It can lead to deer overpopulation that can wreak havoc to the ecosystem. And it can kill the deer people are trying to help.

Deer feeding is definitely involved with a number of diseases, said Kevin Keel, DVM, PhD, Dipl. ACVP, a wildlife pathologist with the SE Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study in the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Georgia.

Bovine TB

"Bovine tuberculosis (TB) is a prime example," Keel said. "It is caused by a bacterium called Mycobacterium bovis. This bacterium is similar to the agent of human tuberculosis and can cause a generally milder disease in humans. It originally spilled over into deer from cattle, but has since been maintained in deer in a corner of Michigan. The occurrence of bovine tuberculosis in deer in Michigan is directly correlated with the practice of baiting deer. The more deer are fed, the greater the number with bovine TB."

Another good example is bovine brucellosis in and around Yellowstone National Park. Like bovine tuberculosis, this is a cattle disease that originally spread to elk and later to bison. In the Greater Yellowstone Area, elk and bison are artificially fed in the winter.

"This has led to high populations and a dense, focal accumulation of animals in the winter," Keel said. "This also happens to be the time when elk with brucellosis exhibit one of the principal signs of the disease, abortions. The aborted fetuses and placentas are heavily laden with the Brucella abortus, the bacteria causing the disease. These can contaminate the feed grounds so that animals may be infected while feeding, but other elk are often curious and will lick or nibble at the aborted material. This is a situation that greatly encourages transmission of the disease and the feed grounds certainly contribute to persistence of this disease in the Greater Yellowstone Area."

Chronic Wasting Disease

Another concern is Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD), which is the mad cow variant in deer. CWD is of double concern because there are worries that eating deer meat contaminated with CWD could cause human illness. With deer meat an important part of their diet for many people, this is a huge concern.

There is an organization called Arkansas Hunters Feeding the Hungry that last year harvested 1,000 deer that were sent to food banks and other charitable organizations. The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission says one deer can provide meals for between 50 and 100 people.

Keel said the practice of feeding deer is a concern with CWD because it is likely spread in a fecal-oral manner and persists in the environment.

CWD -- a tough study

"However, CWD is such a slowly progressive disease that it is much harder to investigate and we haven't been able to show the tight correlations with feeding that we've demonstrated with bovine tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis," Keel said.

The closest CWD has been found to Northwest Arkansas is western Kansas and northern Illinois.

Interstate transportation of captive deer and elk has been stopped in most states.

Other problems with feeding of deer include the syndrome of hair loss in white-tailed deer.

"We've also seen a number of deer with unusual swelling of the muzzle that seems to be associated with feeding," Keel said.

Another concern is, in some areas, the deer population has been linked to the prevalence of Lyme disease in people.

"This is not because deer carry the agent, but because they are an essential host in the life cycle of the tick that transmits the Lyme disease agent," Keel said. "However, this is a very complicated issue and the density of rodents, the intermediate hosts of the ticks, also has to be taken into account. Some studies found that tick density increased with deer density at a broad scale but others report that deer density is a poor predictor of tick abundance, probably due to the effect of rodent populations. Complete removal of deer is associated with elimination of the ticks, but that is not a realistic option unless you live on a small island."

The lone-star tick

Current evidence indicates a definite association between deer density and human diseases transmitted by the lone-star tick. Keel said white-tailed deer are the principal host for all life stages of the lone star tick and the abundance of the ticks and deer are tightly linked. Several human diseases (human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis, /Ehrlichia ewingii/ehrlichiosis and southern tick-associated rash illnesses) are known to be transmitted by lone star ticks or, in the case of southern tick-associated rash illness, are suspected to be transmitted by lone star ticks.

"These diseases were not recognized until the 1980s and 1990s and their emergence is likely associated with increasing populations of white-tailed deer," Keel said. "I should also add that I do a great deal of work on deer health and generally assess density dependent problems. Higher deer populations contribute not only to some infectious diseases, but also to greater parasite burdens that can impact deer health. Lungworms and parasites of the gastrointestinal tract are mostly responsible and are higher in areas of high deer density. These parasites can cause significant problems in deer particularly in younger animals."

Lovely County Citizen: Story: Feeding deer associated with a human and deer illnesses

Friday, July 10, 2009

Rhinoceros-Poaching Nears 15-Year High

Rhinoceros-Poaching Nears 15-Year High on Horn Demand in Asia - Bloomberg.com

By Alex Morales

July 9 (Bloomberg) -- The illegal trade of rhinoceros horns that are coveted by practitioners of traditional Asian medicine is sparking new demand from poachers, environmental groups said.

The level of illegal rhino killings in Africa may hit a 15- year high, according to a document posted today on the Web site of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, an international agreement with 175 member-states. While the population of black and white rhinos is on the rise, the up-tick in poaching is a “major concern,” the study said.

“It is clear that there has been a serious escalation in illegal” hunting, the CITES report said. “Illegal rhinoceros horn trade to destinations in Asia is driving this killing, with growing evidence of the ongoing involvement of Vietnamese, Chinese and Thai nationals.”

Since the beginning of 2008, at least 12 rhinos have been slaughtered each month in Zimbabwe and South Africa alone, higher than an Africa-wide average of 3.5 a month from 2000 to 2005, the report said.

Rhino populations in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal are also at risk from increased poaching, said the report, which recommended increased monitoring of legal sport-hunting and better enforcement of laws governing animal products.

In Africa, the white rhino is classified as near-threatened on the Red List of endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, with more than 17,000 found in the wild across the continent.

Black Rhino Falloff

The population of the black rhino, which was more numerous than the white species for most of the last century, fell below 2,500 in the 1990s with the animal now classed as “critically endangered,” the highest degree of threat. The latest count showed there are just over 4,000 individuals.

In Asia, the Javan and Sumatran rhinos are also classed as critically endangered, with the Indian rhino listed as vulnerable.

Today’s briefing to Geneva-based CITES was prepared by the Swiss-based IUCN, the conservation group WWF International, known in the U.S. as the World Wildlife Fund, and Traffic, a Cambridge, U.K.-based group set up by the IUCN and WWF that monitors the international wildlife trade.

To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Morales in London at amorales2@bloomberg.net.

Rhinoceros-Poaching Nears 15-Year High on Horn Demand in Asia - Bloomberg.com

Monday, January 5, 2009

How Hunting is Driving "Evolution in Reverse."

Some of the most iconic photographs of Teddy Roosevelt, one of the first conservationists in American politics, show the president posing companionably with the prizes of his trophy hunts. An elephant felled in Africa in 1909 points its tusks skyward; a Cape buffalo, crowned with horns in the shape of a handlebar mustache, slumps in a Kenyan swamp. In North America, he stalked deer, pronghorn antelope, bighorn sheep and elk, which he called "lordly game" for their majestic antlers. What's remarkable about these photographs is not that they depict a hunter who was also naturalist John Muir's staunchest political ally. It's that just 100 years after his expeditions, many of the kind of magnificent trophies he routinely captured are becoming rare.

Elk still range across parts of North America, but every hunting season brings a greater challenge to find the sought-after bull with a towering spread of antlers. Africa and Asia still have elephants, but Roosevelt would have regarded most of them as freaks, because they don't have tusks. Researchers describe what's happening as none other than the selection process that Darwin made famous: the fittest of a species survive to reproduce and pass along their traits to succeeding generations, while the traits of the unfit gradually disappear. Selective hunting—picking out individuals with the best horns or antlers, or the largest piece of hide—works in reverse: the evolutionary loser is not the small and defenseless, but the biggest and best-equipped to win mates or fend off attackers.

When hunting is severe enough to outstrip other threats to survival, the unsought, middling individuals make out better than the alpha animals, and the species changes. "Survival of the fittest" is still the rule, but the "fit" begin to look unlike what you might expect. And looks aren't the only things changing: behavior adapts too, from how hunted animals act to how they reproduce. There's nothing wrong with a species getting molded over time by new kinds of risk. But some experts believe problems arise when these changes make no evolutionary sense.

Ram Mountain in Alberta, Canada, is home to a population of bighorn sheep, whose most vulnerable individuals are males with thick, curving horns that give them a regal, Princess Leia look. In the course of 30 years of study, biologist Marco Festa-Bianchet of the University of Sherbrooke in Quebec found a roughly 25 percent decline in the size of these horns, and both male and female sheep getting smaller. There's no mystery on Ram Mountain: male sheep with big horns tend to be larger and produce larger offspring. During the fall rut, or breeding season, these alpha rams mate more than any other males, by winning fights or thwarting other males' access to their ewes. Their success, however, is contingent upon their surviving the two-month hunting season just before the rut, and in a strange way, they're competing against their horns. Around the age of 4, their horn size makes them legal game—several years before their reproductive peak. That means smaller-horned males get far more opportunity to mate.

How Hunting is Driving "Evolution in Reverse." | Newsweek Project Green | Newsweek.com

Thursday, November 20, 2008

57 Wildlife Criminal Suspects Grabbed in African Crackdown

 

57 Wildlife Criminal Suspects Grabbed in African Crackdown NAIROBI, Kenya, November 17, 2008 (ENS) - Africa's largest international operation against wildlife crime has netted 57 suspected illegal wildlife product dealers and 1,000 kilograms of powdered, carved and raw items of ivory in coordinated raids across five African countries. On the weekend, Kenya Wildlife Service, the Lusaka Agreement Task Force and INTERPOL personnel raided local ivory markets, airports, border crossings and smuggling points. Cheetah, leopard, serval cat and python skins, as well as hippo teeth also were seized. Kenya served as the coordination center for the simultaneous operation in the other participating countries - Congo Brazzaville, Ghana, Uganda and Zambia. More than 300 staff from the police, customs, wildlife agencies, national intelligence agencies and the Lusaka Agreement Task Force were involved in the operation across the five countries. Clement Mwale, right, of the Lusaka Agreement Task Force, displays an ivory necklace seized in a raid this weekend. Nairobi, November 17, 2008. (Photo courtesy Kenya Wildlife Service) "Kenya Wildlife Service used various specialized law enforcement units to conduct the operation. It is also in the process of modernizing and enhancing its law enforcement capacity through the acquisition of ivory detectors, and other specialized security equipment, in order to counter wildlife crimes more efficiently," said the KWS Director Julius Kipngetich.

57 Wildlife Criminal Suspects Grabbed in African Crackdown

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk - Journal Article

 

Abstract When females search for mates and their perceived risk of predation increases, they less often express preferences for males that use conspicuous courtship signals, relaxing sexual selection on production of these signals. Here, we report an apparent exception to this general pattern. Courting male fiddler crabs Uca beebei sometimes build pillars of mud at the openings to their burrows in which crabs mate. Females visit several males before they choose a mate by staying and breeding in their burrows, and they preferentially visit males with pillars. Previous studies suggested that this preference is based on a visual orientation behaviour that may reduce females' risk of predation while searching for a mate. We tested this idea by determining whether the female preference for males with pillars increases with perceived predation risk. We attracted avian predators to where crabs were courting and measured the rates that sexually receptive females visited courting males with and without mud pillars. Under elevated risk, females continued to search for mates and they showed a stronger relative preference for males with pillars. Thus, when predation risk is high, females may continue to express preferences that are under natural selection because they help females avoid predation, strengthening sexual selection for use of the preferred signal.

Royal Society Publishing - Proc. R. Soc. B (1996-) - First Cite - The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk - Journal Article